About Pick Of High Testosterone
Pick Of High Testosterone Information
1 Pick Of High Testosterone Loading
2 Pick Of High Testosterone Loading
3 Pick Of High Testosterone Loading
4 Pick Of High Testosterone Loading
5 Pick Of High Testosterone Loading
6 Pick Of High Testosterone Loading
Questions and Answers
Does the other testicle really pick up your testosterone where the other one left off? About 7 weeks ago I had an injury to my left testicle, I am not even sure what fully went on but I know I have varicocele veins all around it I know I feel like absolute crap and I know it hurts I took a testosterone test and it was about 400 , which is very low for someone my age(28) and based on how I feel I imagine my testosterone was very high before this as I had an extremly high sex drive I have consistently felt like crap for the last 7 weeks, no change I dont think People say your other testicle picks up where the other one leaves off but I dont feel anything, is this true? I have a feeling I might have also got orchitis in my injured testicle cuz this is a mens health message board and I figure id ask

Mr.C replied: "Why not keep this question to yourself?"

Connor replied: "Well you NEED to go get it looked at by a doctor. Like withing the next two days! Yes that is true, but it's only true if the other one stopps working completly. so my guess is that one still works. -Connor"

MissKitty replied: "Give it time to heal. This is why we have two eyes, two ears, two hands. If you lose one in an accident, the remaining one can learn to compensate. Women who have lost an ovary can still have children. Your body will heal and your hormone levels will normalize, most likely. Keep in close contact with your doctor, they can give you testosterone supplements if needed."

Tim replied: "Men with only one testicle generally report having the same sex drive as men with two. You are probably just still recovering physically and mentally. In any case, nowadays a high sex drive is generally a inhibiting factor to a man's success."

Would it be good or bad? A hypothetical about sexual relationships? Me and my girlfriend had a discussion of what true sexual freedom might look like as in, a hypothetical world where people could agree to be together, but are ok not owning each other, stds and pregnancies are preventable, and paternity testing makes sure the right guys are raising the right babies and we had some ideas about what it might look like. We know that men want to have sex with lots of women to spread their seed far and wide, but women invest more in their offspring and therefore are selective. This makes women the chooser in the sexual game. However, women what different things at different times. Ive read that ovulating women want square jaw, high testosterone hotties when theyre ovulating to give their children the strongest genes, but want a man with softer features who are more likely to stick around and be a good dad during the rest of her cycle. Studies show that women are pretty good at picking out between the two. And women are more likely to cheat during monogamous relationships. In other monogamous animals, like birds, females do the same. They have flings with high testosterone, usually younger, males, but continuously mate with life partners that have every reason to assist in rearing the chicks since its a good likelihood theyre the dad. So what if we were socialized to accept behavior more in tune with these instincts? We were ok that some men get many short term partners at some point in their lives, other men get to be super dads and get steady sex and maybe a fling or two if they can pull it off - and women get both the mates and flings with no regrets? Would it be good or bad? And if you can put yourself it such a world, is it good for the guys? Is it good for the girls? And how do you see yourself going about in such a world, and why?

squirrelbabygirl7 replied: "No not really. I dont' agree it would be good for either, gender let alone the kids. Basically it makes sex a matsturbation with another person rather than about the connnection between people, emotional and spiritual reflected in the physical."

SUSAN O replied: "You must have seen the " Today " show today. Well, I have mixed feelings about the whole thing. Ideally we would all be with the ONE and only them forever and be totally ecstatically in love forever too. But that is somehow so uncommon nowadays. Maybe if we had not become people that psychoanalyse things so much we could have lived the life you are explaining and it would all make sense and no one would have problems with it. It seems like everyone would get their needs met. But, yeah, you'd end up with fathers that never saw their children grow and other men raising the kids. Yet that is not so different from what we see now much of the time. God, that is a tough one . Good Luck with that!"

Lori S replied: "If we were socialized to accept behavior more in tune with the animal kingdom, we would be animals. People are animalistic enough in their tendencies. Your hypothetical situation is a reality in some places, where 80% of the births are out of wedlock, 7 out of 10 homes are fatherless, single mothers give birth to multiple children with multiple fathers, and single men are fathering multiple children with multiple women, and supporting none of them. I know a lady who has 5 different children with 5 different men. All of the kids are big and strong and healthy - and fatherless, poor, and unhappy. She's on welfare, has no education, and isn't looking real attractive to men who have the means to support them all. I don't think that scenario is working very well."

jonmcn49 replied: "We are human beings and have an evolved history. Your take on socialization is a social science perspective; completely backwards. Societies emerge from human interaction and are shaped by humans; they do not arbitrarily shape humans. I can barley get a bit of coherence from reading your question. I think you may have totally misunderstood findings of evolutionary biology. PS WE are Homo sapien and are basically monogamous with some polygamous behavior. We are not birds, monkeys, or any other species."

zak replied: "good informations.. ... i dont know...but to see if ur hypothesis is realistic lets ask ourself what does sex means to man & what does sex means to women whats the deep motivation which leaded us to sex?"

Neha replied: "we discussed this in psychology class scientifically, a successful species is one that can reproduce successfully and efficiently, so it would be a good thing but then we have our mind, our conscience and from that the come the morals and higher emotion that governs society, I wouldn't prefer an instinctual society, even if it does benefit humanity, I don't mean to sound selfish, but that's why things are not the way you described them, the way things could be, people do like the emotional aspect of relationships sometimes, it depends on the person though, it REALLY depends on the eprson, there are a lot of people who wouldn't mind a society like the one you described but like I said, I don't like the idea"

Voodoid replied: "Can you say "plagiarism"?"

youaintme replied: "i cant read all that so ill just say maybe"

no one replied: "I disagree. High valued males are the choosers. The rest of the beta males have the females choosing among them, simply due to the sheer mass in number of betas. But that's not even on the same level as the alphas. In society, they'd be known as high profile people of importance, say moviestars, social connaisseurs, or politicians, or just flat out big spenders. Popular people, within their circles. They're the choosers. Like Hugh Hefner. 3 girlfriends are nothing to him, and they all know about each other. You can't put a price on Alpha. And to be it, is simply a matter of standard, and consistancy. Standard, meaning one accepts nothing less. And consistancy meaning that you are constantly in that state of being, even when it seems unpleasant or inconvenient to be it. As though when one is first being recognized and challenged to prove they are that position. All very primitive really. Basic instincts."

How's Girls PE like? (middle/high school)? Before middle school, I never undressed in front of others. First day boys PE in 6th grade was filled with anxiety. How would I change in only 3 mins? Would I get laughed at cause I'm changing? Fortunately these two became non-issues. I always wished they had air conditioners and deodorizers. Heavy noise, mondo stench, locker banging and a ton of attitude and testosterone. Fortunately the showers were never used :-) In high school, the coach warned that jocks after school would come in and kick everyone's locks real hard. Does this happen in GPE? BPE brings out the worst in people. You met the worst jerks. I got picked on the most there. Of course not everyone switches to Jerk Mode. FYI, art classes seemed to have the nicest people. I hardly ever got picked on. *NOTE: I'm 27. K-12 was long time ago. Still I've always wonder about the girls side of the fence.

spy4lyf replied: "well i no @ my school we have co-ed pe and i loved it(Hot Guys Working out) but i love to work out and they guys love to watch me work out:D"

love2act94 replied: "no you wont. you have the option of changing in the bath room. remember everyone else is feeling this way and they are not staring at you. the "jock"(just became one) are not kicking no body's butt. first if they do they cant play the sport and second they don't want to kick your butt. they are actually really nice and sweet.when you become an upper class man you will look back and laugh at how nervous you were. really it isn't bad. PE is fun and in high school it is supper easy. hope i helped."

Stifler's Mum replied: "Physical Education I required Units covered are geared towards individual and team sports. The units covered are aerobics, flag football, soccer, volleyball, basketball, weight training, fitness, badminton, fitness walking, track and field, softball and wrestling. 0.5 Credits Prerequisite: None Health: A Wellness Decision required Designed to reinforce positive health attitudes and skills previously developed and to allow young people to assess the lifestyle decisions that contribute to wellness. Units of study within the course include: positive ways of handling stress vs. negative ways of handling stress, addictions, your health history, responsible sexuality, self care vs. the pill-fairy model, first aid and CPR. 0.5 Credits (1 Semester) Prerequisite: None Physical Education II required Units covered are geared towards individual and dual sports and team sports. Units covered are aerobics, gator ball, speedball, volleyball, basketball, fitness, weight training, badminton, fitness walking, softball, pickle ball, flag football, country line dancing and hockey. 1 Credit (2 Semesters) Prerequisite: None Physical Education Elective Units are geared toward lifetime sports. Units covered are aerobics, self-defense, aquacise, cross-country skiing, table tennis, golf, archery, badminton, bowling, and fitness walking. Guest speakers to promote careers in physical education are scheduled. Cost of $1.50 for Aquacise, approximately $8.00 for bowling, and approximately $20-$25 for golfing. 1 Credit (2 Semesters) Prerequisites: PE I and PE II, grade of C or better"

LOL :) replied: "well at my high school we had coed PE, and that's always fun :) Changing was no biggie, there were dressing stalls and bathrooms to change in. The girls were friendly, no bullying. We'd just talk and gossip and stuff while we changed then go on about our business."

dani replied: "At my school you have the option of getting changed in the toilets. But you can still get changed all together usually you don't see much for the girls always have shorts or singlets on thanklord."

what do you think about this funny ideas? Confucius Says..... "Man who run in front of car get tired" "Man who run behind car get exhausted" "Two wrongs not make a right - Three lefts do" "Man who eat many prunes get good run for money." "War doesn't determine who's right. War determines who's left." "Man who tell one too many light bulb jokes soon burn out!" "Man who sit on tack get point!" "Man who stand on toilet is high on pot!" "Man who lives in glass house should change in basement" "If you want pretty nurse, you got to be patient." Top 10 Words That Don't Exist... But Should... 1. AQUADEXTROUS (ak wa deks' trus) adj. Possessing the ability to turn the bathtub faucet on and off with your toes. 2. CARPERPETUATION (kar' pur pet u a shun) n. The act, when vacuuming,or running over a string or a piece of lint at least a dozen times, reaching over and picking it up, examining it, then putting it back down to give the vacuum one more chance. 3. DISCONFECT (dis kon fekt') v. To sterilize the piece of candy you dropped on the floor by blowing on it, assuming this will somehow remove all the germs. 4. ELBONICS (el bon' iks) n. The actions of two people maneuvering for one armrest in a movie theater. 5. FRUST (frust) n. The small line of debris that refuses to be swept onto the dust pan and keeps backing a person across the room until he finally decides to give up and sweep it under the rug. 6. LACTOMANGULATION (lak' to man gyu lay' shun) n. Manhandling the "open here" spout on a milk container so badly that one has to resort to the 'illegal' side. 7. PEPPIER (pehp ee ay') n. The waiter at a fancy restaurant whose sole purpose seems to be walking around asking diners if they want ground pepper. 8. PHONESIA (fo nee' zhuh) n. The affliction of dialing a phone number and forgetting whom you were calling just as they answer. 9. PUPKUS (pup' kus) n. The moist residue left on a window after a dog presses its nose to it. 10. TELECRASTINATION (tel e kras tin ay' shun) n. The act of always letting the phone ring at least twice before you pick it up, even when you're only six inches away. Giving 100% Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%? We have all been to those meetings where someone wants over 100%. How about achieving 103%? Here's a little math that might prove helpful. What makes life 100%? If A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z is represented as: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. Then, H A R D W O R K 8 1 18 4 23 15 18 11 = 98% K N O W L E D G E 11 14 15 23 12 5 4 7 5 = 96% But, A T T I T U D E 1 20 20 9 20 21 4 5 = 100% And, B U L L S H I T 2 21 12 12 19 8 9 20 = 103% So, it stands to reason that hardwork and knowledge will get you close, attitude will get you there, but bullshit will put you over the top. And look how far ......... A S S K I S S I N G 1 19 19 11 9 19 19 9 14 7 = 118% will take you. Philosophy 101 A professor stood before his Philosophy 101 class and had some items in front of him. When the class began, wordlessly, he picked up a very large and empty mayonnaise jar and proceeded to fill it with golf balls. He then asked the students if the jar was full? They agreed that it was. So the professor then picked up a box of pebbles and poured them into the jar. He shook the jar lightly. The pebbles, of course, rolled into the open areas between the golf balls. He then asked the students again if the jar was full. They agreed it was. The professor picked up a box of sand and poured it into the jar. Of course, the sand filled up everything else. He then asked once more if the jar was full. The students responded with a unanimous - - yes. The professor then produced two cans of beer from under the table and proceeded to pour the entire contents into the jar effectively filling the empty space between the sand. The students laughed. "Now," said the professor, as the laughter subsided, "I want you to recognize that this jar represents your life. The golf balls are the important things - - your family, your partner, your health, your children, your friends, your favorite passions - - things that if everything else was lost and only they remained, your life would still be full." "The pebbles are the other things that matter like your job, your house, your car. The sand is everything else - - the small stuff." "If you put the sand into the jar first," he continued, "there is no room for the pebbles or the golf balls. The same goes for your life. If you spend all your time and energy on the small stuff, you will never have room for the things that are important to you. Pay attention to the things that are critical to your happiness. Play with your children. Take time to get medical checkups. Take your partner out dancing. Play another 18. There will always be time for me to go to work, clean the house, give a dinner party and fix the disposal." "Take care of the golf balls first -- the things that really matter. Set your priorities. The rest is just sand." One of the students raised her hand and inquired what the beer represented. The professor smiled. "I'm glad you asked. It just goes to show you that no matter how full your life may seem, there's always room for a couple of beers! Worthy of Heaven A man appears before St. Peter at the pearly gates. "Have you ever done anything of particular merit?" St. Peter asks. "Well, I can think of one thing," the man offers. "Once, on a trip to the Black Hills, out in South Dakota, I came upon a gang of high-testosterone bikers who were threatening a young woman. I directed them to leave her alone, but they wouldn't listen. So I approached the largest and most heavily tattooed biker. I smacked him on the head, kicked his bike over, ripped out his nose ring and threw it on the ground, and told him, 'Leave her alone now or you'll answer to me.'" St. Peter was impressed. "When did this happen?" "Just a couple of minutes ago." Philosophy of Hypocrisy and Ambiguity 1. Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things. 2. One tequila, two tequila, three tequila, floor..... 3. Atheism is a non-prophet organization. 4. If man evolved from monkeys and apes, why do we still have monkeys and apes? 5. The main reason Santa is so jolly is because he knows where all the bad girls live. 6. I went to a bookstore and asked the saleswoman, "Where's the self-help section?" She said if she told me, it would defeat the purpose. 7. What if there were no hypothetical questions? 8. If a deaf person swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap? 9. If someone with multiple personalities threatens to kill himself, is it considered a hostage situation? 10. Is there another word for synonym? 11. Where do forest rangers go to "get away from it all?" 12. What do you do when you see an endangered animal eating an endangered plant? 13. If a parsley farmer is sued, can they garnish his wages? 14. Would a fly without wings be called a walk? 15. Why do they lock gas station bathrooms? Are they afraid someone will clean them? 16. If a turtle doesn't have a shell, is he homeless or naked? 17. Can vegetarians eat animal crackers? 18. If the police arrest a mime, do they tell him he has the right to remain silent? 19. Why do they put Braille on the drive-through bank machines? 20. How do they get deer to cross the road only at those yellow road signs? 21. What was the best thing before sliced bread? 22. One nice thing about egotists: they don't talk about other people. 23. Does the Little Mermaid wear an algebra? 24. Do infants enjoy infancy as much as adults enjoy adultery? 25. How is it possible to have a civil war? 26. If one synchronized swimmer drowns, do the rest drown, too? 27. If you ate both pasta and antipasto, would you still be hungry? 28. If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done? 29. Whose cruel idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have "S" in it? 30. Why are hemorrhoids called "hemorrhoids" instead of "assteroids"? 31. Why is it called tourist season if we can't shoot at them? 32. Why is there an expiration date on sour cream? 33. If you spin an oriental man in a circle three times does he become disoriented? Deep Thoughts #1 Gardening Rule: When weeding, the best way to make sure you are removing a weed and not a valuable plant is to pull on it. If it comes out of the ground easily, it is a valuable plant. The easiest way to find something lost around the house is to buy a replacement. Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway. There are two kinds of pedestrians -- the quick and the dead. Life is sexually transmitted. An unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys. If quitters never win, and winners never quit, then who is the fool who said "Quit while you're ahead?" The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth. Get the last word in: Apologize. Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day; teach that person to use the Internet and they won't bother you for weeks. Some people are like Slinkies . . . not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs. No Dirty Words It is hard to find a joke without a dirty word or two in it. Here is one with none: Two tall trees, a birch and a beech, are growing in the woods. A small tree begins to grow between them, and the beech says to the birch, "Is that a son of a beech or a son of a birch?" The birch says he cannot tell. Just then a woodpecker lands on the sapling. The birch says, "Woodpecker, you are a tree expert. Can you tell if that is a son of a beech or a son of a birch?" The woodpecker takes a taste of the small tree. He replies, "It is neither a son of a beech nor a son of a birch. It is, however, the best piece of ash I have ever put my pecker in." Where This Word Come From Did you know..... In the 16th and 17th centuries, everything had to be transported by ship and it was also before commercial fertilizer's invention, so large shipments of manure were common. It was shipped dry, because in dry form it weighed a lot less than when wet, but once water (at sea) hit it, it not only became heavier, but the process of fermentation began again, of which a by product is methane gas. As the stuff was stored below decks in bundles you can see what could and did happen. Methane began to build up below decks and the first time someone came below at night with a lantern, BOOOOM! Several ships were destroyed in this manner before it was determined justwhat was happening. After that, the bundles of manure were always stamped with the term "Ship High In Transit" on them which meant for the sailors to stow it high enough off the lower decks so that any water that came into the hold would not touch this volatile cargo and start the production of methane. Thus evolved the term "S.H.I.T " , (Ship High In Transport)which has come down through the centuries and is in use to this very day. You probably did not know the true history of this word. Neither did I. I always thought it was a golf term. !!!!!!! 10 things a man can do at Wal-Mart Here are 10 things a man can do at Wal-Mart while his wife is taking her sweet time: 1. Get 24 boxes of condoms & randomly put them in people's carts when they aren't looking. 2. Get on the PA system and announce in an official tone: 'All cars in row 1 of the parking lot are illegally parked and will be towed. Will the owner of the cars please move them'. . and see what happens. 3. Make a trail of tomato juice on the floor leading to the ladies rest-room. 4. Get on the PA system and announce in an official tone: 'Code 3, Housewares' . . and see what happens. 5. Go to the Service Desk and ask to put a bag of M&M's on lay-away. 6. Move a 'CAUTION - WET FLOOR' sign to a carpeted area. 10. While handling guns in the Hunting Department, ask the clerk if he knows where the bullets and anti-depressants are. 12. In the Auto Department, practice your "Madonna look" using different sized funnels. 13. Hide in a clothing rack and when people browse through, say: "PICK ME!!! PICK ME!!!" 15. Go into a fitting room, shut the door and wait a while . . . then yell loudly: "There's no toilet paper in here!"

Portland replied: "Don't quit your day job."

Janny C replied: "wow...were you bored? I thought they were funny though thanks for the pick me up! tra la la la!"

Jenny B replied: "i love the 10 words! ahhahhaaa"

monique b replied: "This is all extremely funny but you have issues coming up with all of this? Very funny"

jack russell girl replied: "This is so funny! Thanks for making me smile and laugh!"

K*8*E replied: "My Favorite is Giving 100%!!!"

good or bad? a hypothetical about sex and relationships? Me and my girlfriend had a discussion of what true sexual freedom might look like as in, a hypothetical world where people could agree to be together, but are ok not owning each other, stds and pregnancies are preventable, and paternity testing makes sure the right guys are raising the right babies and we had some ideas about what it might look like. We know that men want to have sex with lots of women to spread their seed far and wide, but women invest more in their offspring and therefore are selective. This makes women the chooser in the sexual game. However, women what different things at different times. Ive read that ovulating women want square jaw, high testosterone hotties when theyre ovulating to give their children the strongest genes, but want a man with softer features who are more likely to stick around and be a good dad during the rest of her cycle. Studies show that women are pretty good at picking out between the two. And women are more likely to cheat during monogamous relationships. In other monogamous animals, like birds, females do the same. They have flings with high testosterone, usually younger, males, but continuously mate with life partners that have every reason to assist in rearing the chicks since its a good likelihood theyre the dad. So what if we were socialized to accept behavior more in tune with these instincts? We were ok that some men get many short term partners at some point in their lives, other men get to be super dads and get steady sex and maybe a fling or two if they can pull it off - and women get both the mates and flings with no regrets? Would it be good or bad? And if you can put yourself it such a world, is it good for the guys? Is it good for the girls? And how do you see yourself going about in such a world, and why?

SadisfaShawnGaranteeIpak replied: "moral son that shit aint right step up take what yours and be a man I have been a man since nine yrs old dude I have seen more than most in a lifetime but raising a child nowadays would be great if there were a real parent relationship insteda all the kids with divorced or single parednts.. Bothe parentrs in the house is very rair nowadays"

Can you have putuitary tumor and pcos but not have cushings? I was told about a month ago that I have a microadenoma pituitary tumor. The doc order labs and told me that he would call me when the labs are back. I went and got a copy of my labs and saw that he was still awaiting the results on one, but that my testosterone was high as well as my cortisol. He called and told me that my labs was fine..except for my testosterone and due to all my body hair and labs he is diagnosing me with PCOS but he want me to go pick up the dexamethasone at the pharmacy and take it at 11pm and get blood drawn at 8am the following morning. He did not tell me that my cortisol was high and that the new blood work is a follow-up test from my 24-hour urine test. I also know that PCOS is related to cushings and that the new labs is done to help confirm or rule out cushings. He also told me that my tumor is a non-hormone producing tumor. If I have high testosterone (hormone) wouldn't my tumor be a hormone producing tumor? Can I have a tumor and pcos but not cushings?

shygirlxoxo replied: "Many people (like me) have been diagnosed as PCOS without enough testing for Cushing's. They arent related in the normal sense of the word although they do mimic each other in many ways. There are several people that I have met that have both PCOS and Cushing's. Doctors sometimes go off of the OLD assumption that the dexamethasone test can be used to rule out Cushing's and this is an outdated way of thinking. MANY of the people on our board have suppressed on that test and have gone on to be diagnosed later. It is a helpful test but cant be used to say you dont have Cushing's. 11pm salivary cortisol tests are much more effective! Come over and join the boards there is so much info on all of this there. I'm shygirlxoxo on the boards and you can ask me anything you might need to know."

would this be heavan or hell you you? sort of a long philosophy question on relationships? A study featured on yahoo and webmd showed that women were very good at picking up cues from a mans face to see if hed be a good father or a good fling. Turns out, the female nature is to seek out one type of guy to build a nest with, and another to pass genes to her offspring with, and ends up having sex with both at different times of her cycle. Like many mnogomous species, namely birds, males want to do it whenver, whereas females are more picky and want a mate to help her raise her offspring but often have flings with high testosterone males with strong masculine features. The result is the mate male, in birds often an older male with less testosterone, raises offspring of a male with stronger genes. Indeed, at least 10% of men are unwittingly raising somebody elses kid! With humans, studies show that women find family guys attractive 90% of the time, but prefer a hunky hottie during ovulation. Ovulation is when women are most likely to cheat. Plus, many women choose the guys who make good for flings when theyre young and not looking to settle down, but choose men with softer features when they want to build a family. However, Id be willing to bet their biology doesnt stop sending the dual signal just because society says its time to grow up. Of course, we are in a time when women can control whether sex leads to pregnancy, and sex has become about fulfillment as much as procreation. So what if society was built around at least some men getting many partners, other men getting steady sex, and women getting both the mates and flings with no regrets? Its science fiction, but imagine that disease prevention, birth control, and paternity testing eliminated the need for enforced monogamy. Women could commit to a guy for the long term, but still fulfill her desires when nature calls. Naturally, there would be a group of guys who got a lot of different women, and another group that got a steady stream of sex with one. If you can put yourself in such a world, is it paradise or hell? Who is it best to be? Who is it worst to be? And what role would you most likely play, and why?

Serena replied: "The problem is, most guys that are the type to settle down and be good father's and are steady are often not the cute ones (not always the case...but more than often true.) When a woman is ovulating, they are often full of desire and if not commited to a certain man, will tend to lean towards the bad boy types because they generally are pretty hot. But luckily with the way things are today, this is not as likely to be the cause of pregnancy. When rationally thinking, if we are trying to get pregnant, we will lean towards the stable sturdy family guy because we are not thinking of sex at that point but more of making a baby (I'm 25 weeks pregnant and my hubby and I performed the act so many times when trying that it really wasn't that exciting after awhile.) Your world that you are describing honestly sounds like hell to me. Monogamy is all I want and when all things are said and done, I want a man that I can cuddle up with and will comfort me when needed. It would probably be heaven for most guys though. Guys cuddle to have sex, girls have sex to cuddle."

Firefly Flame replied: "Setting aside all of the possible flaws in this study and venturing into your sci-fi world, why exactly wouldn't the "stable family guy" not also be getting sex with more than one person? Because no one wants him? That seems kind of unrealistic. Lots of women like dating married men. And sometimes those "fling" guys grow up and decide to settle down, themselves. But, ok, yeah, it's science fiction and we're assuming it's governed by laws other than reality (no disease, no BC, etc.)... It doesn't sound like either a paradise or a hell, to me. I don't think it sounds terribly different from the world we currently live in, except that a whole lot of people have managed to overcome their jealousy, women are openly allowed to do what men do already, and everyone can somehow keep their emotions in check (because if we were to fall in love with the flingy guys or they with us, that could get troublesome, or are we assuming there's polygamy, too?). As a woman, I'd be in the woman's roll, but I've always been attracted to nerds and geeks and wouldn't have any interest in being with the "hotties," no matter what time of the month it is. Sorry."

heavan or hell? a long philosphy type question about relationships? A study featured on yahoo and webmd showed that women were very good at picking up cues from a mans face to see if hed be a good father or a good fling. Turns out, the female nature is to seek out one type of guy to build a nest with, and another to pass genes to her offspring with, and ends up having sex with both at different times of her cycle. Like many mnogomous species, namely birds, males want to do it whenver, whereas females are more picky and want a mate to help her raise her offspring but often have flings with high testosterone males with strong masculine features. The result is the mate male, in birds often an older male with less testosterone, raises offspring of a male with stronger genes. Indeed, at least 10% of men are unwittingly raising somebody elses kid! With humans, studies show that women find family guys attractive 90% of the time, but prefer a hunky hottie during ovulation. Ovulation is when women are most likely to cheat. Plus, many women choose the guys who make good for flings when theyre young and not looking to settle down, but choose men with softer features when they want to build a family. However, Id be willing to bet their biology doesnt stop sending the dual signal just because society says its time to grow up. Of course, we are in a time when women can control whether sex leads to pregnancy, and sex has become about fulfillment as much as procreation. So what if society was built around at least some men getting many partners, other men getting steady sex, and women getting both the mates and flings with no regrets? Its science fiction, but imagine that disease prevention, birth control, and paternity testing eliminated the need for enforced monogamy. Women could commit to a guy for the long term, but still fulfill her desires when nature calls. Naturally, there would be a group of guys who got a lot of different women, and another group that got a steady stream of sex with one. If you can put yourself in such a world, is it paradise or hell? Who is it best to be? Who is it worst to be? And what role would you most likely play, and why?

Lizzy replied: "omg.. wayyyyy too much to read for me.. sorry!"

cristanine replied: "Philosophical views about relations vary from person to person. Statistically, Women are cry babies and the Men are the strong arms...this is what supposedly turn the age era around about Women rights movement. You can't put a table on two legs, but you darn sure can with four. It takes two to tango and anything after that is peaches and cream. I prefer peaches and cream because I don't like to dance much. Take another Xanax your on a role."

zether replied: "i would play the role of GOD in this world, i would defy the standard norm in your world i was not here to unwitingly take care of someone elses kid, if its not mine when its born then out you go, i have no responsibilities to it or you there is a difference in accepting to care for someone elses kids and unwitingly being put into that position against your will or knowledge in the animal kingdon even animals can tell to a certain degree if the ofspring is theirs or not and tend to kill what is not their own, should we be allowed to start butchering children then? your world would be hell because even then some people would still be left out, and alot of other guys would feel resentment and hatred for either the kids or the women, so alot of needless inocents would suffer for no other reason that some failed biology experiment gone terribly wrong"

utopia or hell? A study featured on yahoo and webmd showed that women were very good at picking up cues from a mans face to see if hed be a good father or a good fling. Turns out, the female nature is to seek out one type of guy to build a nest with, and another to pass genes to her offspring with, and ends up having sex with both at different times of her cycle. Like many mnogomous species, namely birds, males want to do it whenver, whereas females are more picky and want a mate to help her raise her offspring but often have flings with high testosterone males with strong masculine features. The result is the mate male, in birds often an older male with less testosterone, raises offspring of a male with stronger genes. Indeed, at least 10% of men are unwittingly raising somebody elses kid! With humans, studies show that women find family guys attractive 90% of the time, but prefer a hunky hottie during ovulation. Ovulation is when women are most likely to cheat. Plus, many women choose the guys who make good for flings when theyre young and not looking to settle down, but choose men with softer features when they want to build a family. However, Id be willing to bet their biology doesnt stop sending the dual signal just because society says its time to grow up. Of course, we are in a time when women can control whether sex leads to pregnancy, and sex has become about fulfillment as much as procreation. So what if society was built around at least some men getting many partners, other men getting steady sex, and women getting both the mates and flings with no regrets? Its science fiction, but imagine that disease prevention, birth control, and paternity testing eliminated the need for enforced monogamy. Women could commit to a guy for the long term, but still fulfill her desires when nature calls. Naturally, there would be a group of guys who got a lot of different women, and another group that got a steady stream of sex with one. If you can put yourself in such a world, is it paradise or hell? Who is it best to be? Who is it worst to be? And what role would you most likely play, and why?

vinnymachismo replied: "bla bla bla bla zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz snor snor snor snor zzzzz cough, wakes up at 3 am to leak back to sleep zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz snor snor snor ... dream, wake up screaming go back to sleep zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz snor snor snor , alarm clock rings, get up , shower , dress , go to work"

no one replied: "It could be either just as this world could, it simply depends on how one chooses to see things, looking at the positive, or negative aspects of it as a majority. I probably would be whatever the woman at hand prefered me as, because I always find it nice to aim to please, especially with my life and how things tend to go about with it. Always find happiness. That in no way means i'm cutting back what I want, but I would like it to be someone who suits me, as long as she does, I don't care about the terms. I'm not possessive. or promiscuous for that matter."

Lao Pu replied: "The problem with this scenario is the same reason why adulterous relationships either become new marriages or disintegrate, because people become attached to the people they have sex with. Whatever their intentions are, these connections develop, and complicate situations in which a person's romantic energy is divided. Jealousy is also a factor, and another reason why such a system would be unsustainable. I don't see people as being able to make the emotional disconnects necessary to make such a society feasible."

keladry78210 replied: "Hm... I've never heard of that, but I suppose it would explain quite a bit. Personally, I think a society designed like that would make it easier on both genders. Women and men alike wouldn't be made to feel guilty about having more than one partner. I don't think it is either paradise or hell or that it would be best to be any one of the three groups, as each fits a different personality and each would appeal to some people. However, I don't see any society like this existing alongside Christianity or any of many other major religions."

lefang replied: "i have a partner we each have a set of children to divorced partners. we live and share the cost of raising our children, where in your utopia do i fit in,or my partner, the challenge of utopian ideals is that someone elses utopia is another persons hell,each of us are unique as individual humans, we only look similar, our upbringing and our genes play an important role in defining who we are as people added to the soup is life experiences that we have faced alone and in partnership and the knowledge to learn from not just our own but other peoples mistakes, it is this life we need to adjust to, these challenges we face without the need to create an hypothetical reality. good luck in your search for a mate. LF"

kinderegg_uk replied: "being female i am actually aware of this phenomenon, and am aware that women can be much much worse than men when it comes to bed hopping, however I've been tamed though ur idea does sound like fun to me.. i don't think it would realistically happen in today's world everyone is too jealous, it would only ever work for a few.... and those few are probably already doing the whole open relationship thing"

would this be heaven or hell? kind of a philosophy type question that has to do with relationships.? A study featured on yahoo and webmd showed that women were very good at picking up cues from a mans face to see if hed be a good father or a good fling. Turns out, the female nature is to seek out one type of guy to build a nest with, and another to pass genes to her offspring with, and ends up having sex with both at different times of her cycle. Like many mnogomous species, namely birds, males want to do it whenver, whereas females are more picky and want a mate to help her raise her offspring but often have flings with high testosterone males with strong masculine features. The result is the mate male, in birds often an older male with less testosterone, raises offspring of a male with stronger genes. Indeed, at least 10% of men are unwittingly raising somebody elses kid! With humans, studies show that women find family guys attractive 90% of the time, but prefer a hunky hottie during ovulation. Ovulation is when women are most likely to cheat. Plus, many women choose the guys who make good for flings when theyre young and not looking to settle down, but choose men with softer features when they want to build a family. However, Id be willing to bet their biology doesnt stop sending the dual signal just because society says its time to grow up. Of course, we are in a time when women can control whether sex leads to pregnancy, and sex has become about fulfillment as much as procreation. So what if society was built around at least some men getting many partners, other men getting steady sex, and women getting both the mates and flings with no regrets? Its science fiction, but imagine that disease prevention, birth control, and paternity testing eliminated the need for enforced monogamy. Women could commit to a guy for the long term, but still fulfill her desires when nature calls. Naturally, there would be a group of guys who got a lot of different women, and another group that got a steady stream of sex with one. If you can put yourself in such a world, is it paradise or hell? Who is it best to be? Who is it worst to be? And what role would you most likely play, and why?

DB9 replied: "Oh man i cant read all this"

sky_pie!! replied: "i did not read that and no1 will that is so freakin long!"

DME B replied: "Women are smarter than men. The reason we don't cheat is that we know in the end it weakens the family (our priority). If there was no familial backlash, women might cheat as much as men. I would sleep around if I was guaranteed no one in my life would be harmed by my doing so. No guarantee, no straying."

openwaterswimgal replied: "Interesting questions. You are talking about a complete retooling of our cultural mores, traditions, and sexual roles, which in turn leads to a complete disruption of capitalism. Think about it. If women were given as much sexual power as you want to ascribe to them in your scenario, how long would Madison Avenue be in business? Frankly, I'd love to see what you describe happen. A disruption of capitalism would do me just fine."

DOMINATUS replied: "lolol its true, im married but when im pre cycle i want clive owen! lolol"

melodywhore replied: "it's not really science fiction for some. what you described sounds like polyamory. a specific group of men to one woman. one she is committed to and the others (could be a set group, could be various) are just there for sexual satisfaction. is it paradise or hell? let's for a moment say that it is science fiction and there are a group of men that are committers and another that are satisfiers (which you could arguably say that these are real world traits for both men and women). if it was accepted in society, i don't think it would be either hell or paradise. it would just be the way it is. the roles would be set and accepted. men that are committed to their women would be happy because they've got what they want and the men that hop from woman to woman are happy because they are getting what they want. but because we are talking about humans here, you'd also have to deal with a degree of cross-over where satisfiers might want what they haven't got and vice versa for the committers. the grass is always greener on the other side."

Fizzle replied: "You failed to take jealousy into account. A few years ago, someone down near Reading, Pennsylvania chased down a woman in broad daylight and cut her throat. Very severely; it was practically a beheading. This is the reason we have rules about such behavior."

Find More Websites
Find More
Pick Of High Testosterone © 2009

Credit Cards  |  Emo Names  |  Pickup Lines
Report Abuse to: abuse(at)5nxs.com